Two years after Beuy's death the Viennese artist Gottfried Helnwein created a striking and odd image bringing Breker and Beuys together. Helnwein posed the eighty-eight-year old Breker unconfortably holding Helnwein's portrait of Beuys in front of his chest. The older man with furrowed brow directs the glossy, skeletal image of Beuys-like an icon painting-away from his own gaze and toward that of the viewer. ...

Both Helnwein and Jeff Koons work in a wide variety of media—frequently on a large scale—and incorporate elements of pop culture and sexuality. But whereas Koons rejects hidden meaning and embraces the superficial “kitsch” element, Helnwein reappropriates these symbols as a means of enhancing his message. Symbols of innocence take on a decidedly sinister air—in Helnwein’s “Los Caprichos” painting installation, a maniacally grinning plastic Mickey Mouse looms over a series of canvases depicting maimed and vulnerable children. Yet Helnwein’s work comes across as more a statement about general victimization of the young and loss of innocence rather than purely a jab at pop culture. Both Koons and Helnwein have produced multiple self-portraits, but they are also drastically different in tone. Koons’ self-portraits glorify the artist in an excessively heroic manner that verges on the ironic, flawlessly groomed and surrounded by attractive women and/or the trappings of success. Helnwein’s self-portraits, on the other hand, depict the artist as a bandaged, disfigured, sub-human figure, often splattered with pigment and displaying all manner of expressions of pain and worry. Both artists indulge in a certain narcissism, but the effect is utterly different. This contrast highlights the basic difference between the two artists: Koons is content to revel in the decadent and superficial, while Helnwein is obsessed with physical and psychological anxieties. ...

The Austro-Irish artist Gottfried Helnwein is responsible for the artworks in this issue. With his hyper-realistic pictures, whose most common subjects are pain, injury and violence, Helnwein (born in 1948) is certainly one of the best-known and at the same time most controversial of German-speaking artists. ...

Let us take one of Helnwein's key images, "Epiphany 1 (Adoration of the Magi)", 1996 (mixed media on canvas, 210 x 333 cm). The figures of the officers in Nazi uniforms observing their leader are genuinely taken from an old photograph. Adolf Hitler is replaced by a seated figure of a young, distinctly Aryan blonde woman in a white dress, holding up with both hands upon her knee a standing, naked, strangely dark haired male infant, who in his face bears certain similarities to his predecessor in the original photograph. The figure of the Madonna, displaying her son to be honoured by the kneeling shepherds, is almost a literal paraphrasing of the painting entitled La Madonna del Rosario, finished by Michelangelo Merisi da Caravaggio in 1607. ...

Gottfried Helnwein's classic yet unnerving images transform sentimental representations of childhood into portraits of individual subjects frozen at the moment of suffering. His photo-paintings pirouette on the fine line between chocolate box pictures/excessive sentimentality and the cost to children of being treated as commodities, of suffering emotional or physical pain at a grown-up's hands.
High pictorial and technical values create compositions that recall contemporary cinema and seventeenth-century painting, expanding the treatment of time into epic. This apparent grandiosity plays against the immediacy of each suffering subject, underlining the different experience of time in childhood. Small hurts can devastate when you're a child. Big hurts stay with you for years, as survivors of Hitler's Anschluss testify.
Now, in the age of virtual use and abuse of children, Helnwein's insistence on valuing the humanity and charm of the littlest, the least powerful, offers a counterpoint to claims that suffering counts most when you're grown-up. It opens his practice into a series of pictorial mise-en-scènes, as did Rembrandt's tableaux in The Blinding of Samson (1636) or The Night Watch (1642). ...

The obvious vulnerability of the subject makes this unusually unsettling imagery. That the scene is playacted is obvious. Based on a photograph staged by the artist, the subject of this watercolor and its details are theatrical inventions. The wrapping is ad hoc, the medical tubing ersatz, and the twine superfluous. Helnwein has successfully tapped into our deep aversion to damage to the flesh, made more acute by the subject’s youth. In one sense the bandaged head is an artifact of twentieth-century warfare, one that gained visual resonance through newsprint photography, which made the casualties of war graphic and real for the masses. In another sense, the bandaged, although not often bloodied invalid, is a visual trope, robbed of its graphic nature by having been reduced to a commonplace in cinema and television. What Helnwein succeeds in doing with Beautiful Victim I is to make us see afresh and react before we can safely square away the image. ...

“All a poet can do today is warn”, World War 1 soldier poet, Wilfred Owen, wrote in a draft Preface for a book of anti-war poems he would never see published. He was killed on the eve of Armistice Day 1918. World War One, The Great War, The War to End All Wars . . . within twenty summers, Europe was engulfed again in the even greater catastrophies of the fascist era. The work of Gottfried Helnwein has its genesis in these years. They obsess him as a creative artist. As a kind of guardian angel, he grapples with them on our behalf. That such a nightmare would never visit us again. Or our children. Or our children’s children. Or “. . .all those still to come”. ...

Nereflektovaná minulost, jež nepřetržitě prorůstá do současnosti a způsobuje úzkost, je Helnweinovým hlavním tématem. Expozice jeho hyperrealistické, za fotografii lehko zaměnitelné malby i fotografií pokračuje v dramaturgické psychologizující linii výstav Galerie Rudolfinum. Gottfried HelnweinHelnweinova tvorba má i silný politický přesah. Malíř se počátkem 70. let zařadil mezi vídeňské akcionisty, kteří kritizovali rakouskou kolektivní amnézii ve vztahu k fašistické minulosti země. Hnutí nezávislých politicky angažovaných umělců se snažila státní moc potlačit, revoltující akcionisty třeba na čas uvěznila či v krajním případě vyhnala do exilu. Při performancích akcionistů tenkrát třeba tekla krev a po zemi se válely vnitřnosti. Dnes je vídeňský akcionismus nejznámějším ryze rakouským avantgardním uměleckým směrem. ...

El nuevo arte del dolor, con esta pretensión provoca una serie de experiencias catárticas que permiten hacer una traducción personal de lo que quiere decir, porque a partir de esta provoca en el espectador una sensación que muchas veces es identificada por cualquier hombre que contemple sus obras.
Una simple manifestación artística que permite hacer de una sola imagen algo que sea comprendido por la mayoría. El llanto de un niño es un símbolo universal en el que su comprensión no necesita de idiomas, ni idiosincrasias, es por eso que el arte de Helnwein legitima esta experiencia, porque de entrada el centrarse en el ser humano mantiene una sola lectura; la del ser humano; cualquier dolor y sensación es conocida sin tenerla que haberla vivido. La obra de este artista mantiene siempre la intención de provocar miedos, deseos, dolor y felicidad con la intención de nunca revelar respuestas, sino que siempre formulará preguntas que hagan al ser humano detenerse y observar para entender: ¿Cómo hemos llegado a esto? ¿Por qué lo seguimos permitiendo? ...

Cindy Sherman und Gottfried Helnwein Selbstbildnisse können zweifelsohne in die Porträtform „ästhetisches Selbstbildniss mit politischer Aussage“ kategoriert werden.
Betrachtet man ihre Werke jedoch im Vergleich, z.B. Hinsichtlich der gestalterischen Mittel oder der Art der Inszenierung, so lassen sich, neben einigen weiteren Gemeinsamkeiten, viele Unterschiede der beiden Künstler feststellen ...